Star Mars :: essays research papers

Star Mars     Since the boom in space technology about 30 historic period ago, universe has found themethod for expanding his existence beyond the many once thought "unbreakablebarriers." Together with this development in space technology came a deepquantity of information and discoveries of the compounds of the universe, andscientific questions seemed to jump out in equal number. The question thatcaptures the eye of the media today causing a bitter controversy is probably themost easy to understand, considering the complex astronomy jargon. Is lifepossible on Mars? The fact is we still dont know. " some(prenominal) of the earlyarguments we now know to be almost certainly erroneous, but even the most recentpieces of register do not unambiguously demonstrate the existence of life onMars." ( Sagan and Shklovskii 273)     Some scientist believe man should look up in the sky searching for newhabitats for future generations, si nce human kind today seems to be going rearward in many aspects of the earths ecology. The first attempt would be tostudy the moon the second, our neighbor planet. Unfortunately, our actualtechnology slightly provides strong, useful information about the tearing planetbecause of the vast distance between us.     While people such as Steven Spielberg and George Lucas try to convinceus with hundred million dollar movies that we atomic number 18 not alone, engineers andgeologists like from the NASA-Stanford University team pursue, based on trueevidence, the idea of possible life on Mars. However, the burden of proof issometimes too overweight even based on real evidence. The tough debate started onAugust 1996, when scientists from the NASA-SU team announced that a meteoritefound on the Antartica contained evidence of yesteryear life on the red planet. Theysupported their conclusion on the basis of organic molecules, carbonates, andminerals found inside the rock, which are basic components of living things.This announcement astound the world, but not the critics who skepticallystated opposite explanations for each of the components discovered. The maindiscussion focused by critics like Allan Treiman arguing that "This scientisthave lowered the standards of evidence rather than raised them, which is whatyou would expect for a claim this extraordinary." (qtd. in Begley and Rogers58) The problem raises when it is proved that those kinds of minerals andorganic molecules found in the meteorite, which fell from Mars about 13,000years ago, can also be formed during nonbiological reactions such as very hightemperatures.     For us, the common magazine readers, it is difficult to deal with thesetwo positions the final acceptation of extraterrestrial life, which is the